Among the earliest canards – something I’ve written about before, in fact – could be the proven fact that females don’t like intercourse, specially casual intercourse, just as much as males do. The punchline to hacky comedians’ jokes and the background noise in movies and sitcoms since pretty much forever it’s the subject of many a heated debate. We’re given any amount of cause of this, from the classic “sperm is cheap/eggs are costly” evo-psych rationale to the greater amount of mercenary “women utilize sex for barter” market view of peoples sex. This supposed disparity between male and libidos that are female section of what drives a great deal of Pick-Up Artists techniques, of Red-Pill rage and several a rant from anime-avatar’d randos on Twitter whenever people dare to recommend otherwise.
The ur-evidence for this belief may be the Clark-Hatfield that is infamous study that has been posted in 1989 and replicated repeatedly by YouTube pranksters as “social experiments” from the time.
Needless to say, the analysis had been fatally flawed; because was described often times, Johnny Rando rolling through to an university campus and asking chicks to bang him betrays a lack that is rather severe of calibration at the best. But despite its flaws and mistaken conclusions, it hangs in within the accepted knowledge of sex relations.
(needless to say, the heteronormative focus with this causes the concept to break apart the moment homo- and bisexuality are introduced in to the mix, to express absolutely nothing of trans women and men… but hey, why let facts block the way of closely held opinions?)